Monday, June 15, 2009

Unedited version of CP release June 15, 2009

Manitoba considering opening up all adoption records going back to 1925

By Chinta Puxley

WINNIPEG ‹ Manitoba is considering opening up all adoption records going back to 1925, which some adoptees say would finally put them on par with others in North America, granting them the right to know their mother's name.

Manitoba passed legislation in 1999 that opened up its adoption records to birth parents and adult adoptees, but the access was not retroactive. For the last decade, adoptees and birth parents have lobbied to have the law changed so they have a right to their full medical and family history.

While some adoptees wonder why it's taking the province so long to consider full access, provincial officials say they are learning from others' mistakes and will launch a legislative review before making any changes.

"There is a North American trend to open records," said Janice Knight, Manitoba's manager of adoption and post-adoption programs. "We're moving into a whole different era and generation. People are asking about it and jurisdictions are moving to that. That's what Manitoba will be looking at."

Manitoba, which oversees about 100 adoptions a year, is proceeding gingerly in the wake of Ontario's court battle over similar legislation.

A group of adoptees and birth parents successfully challenged the Ontario law, saying it violated their right to privacy under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms because it did not contain a disclosure veto for those who didn't want to be contacted. The legislation was rewritten to include a veto and came into effect June 1, 2009. At least 2,500 people in Ontario have signed vetoes that keep their identities secret.

If someone in Manitoba was adopted before 1999 wants to find their birth parent, Knight said the province will contact that person on behalf of the adoptee. If they don't want any contact with their biological child, Knight said the province tries to get as much non- identifying information as possible, including medical history. "There are people involved who really believe that they have a right to know, but . . . we also, as a democratic society, have to balance rights," Knight said. "You can't force somebody to release privacy information without having their consent."

But some adoptees say they have the right to know who they are. Roy Kading, now in his seventies, tracked down his birth mother in 1977 without the help of the government. He said adoptees "live a lie" their entire lives without knowing anything about their background, including their mother's name.

"Why should you be the only person in North America who doesn't know your heritage? That doesn't know your birth mother, your birth father, your siblings? Why should we be different?" said Kading, with LINKS Post-Legal Adoption Support Group.

"Just give this block of people the right to have the same information that everybody else has the right to and that every other jurisdiction has given them."

Kading said he hopes the NDP government will eventually open up all records and extend access to the grandchildren of adoptees and birth parents trying to find out more about their family history.

"I hope they also open it up to grandparents," Kading said. "We have a lot of people who are grandparents - their son has died or their daughter has died, they've had a child and they have no rights. They can't do anything."

Manitoba's ombudsman's office and privacy watchdog declined to comment because it wasn't aware the government had a formal position on a further opening up of adoption records.

But Ontario's Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner says it's difficult for governments to retroactively open up adoption records when it promised people anonymity and sealed their records. "It's very difficult to retroactively open them up unless these individuals can be notified," said Michelle Chibba, director of the Ontario privacy commissioner's policy department. "These are extremely sensitive issues for these individuals. They've started a new life. They have been completely anonymous . . . How could you possibly make contact with those individuals to get their consent to open up these records?"

The Canadian Press

Tuesday, May 19, 2009

What is new in May 2009?

NOTHING, at least nothing has been announced by the government. We keep being assured that change is in the works. The adoption laws of other jurisdictions are being studied to ensure any changes to Manitoba adoption law will be designed for the adoption community of Manitoba. The people studying the laws must think that the adoption community of Manitoba is different from the adoption community of British Columbia, Alberta, Newfoundland & Labrador, Nova Scotia, or Ontario, all of whom have opened their adoption laws to make identifying information available for all adoptees and birthparents, past and future. I do not believe that the people of Manitoba are any different than those of the other provinces.

Why is it taking so long to 'study' these laws? I would think that those involved in Family Services would be well aware and conversant with the adoption laws of other provinces and jurisdictions around the world. The adoption laws, and regulations pertaining to those laws are readily available for study, and in some cases have been for many years. Sounds like a make work project to me. It could be that some of those involved in the 'study' are not fully committed to the task at hand and stalling is a means of voicing their displeasure. Could be some conflict of interest also involved.

I have been told several time during the past 2 years that open adoption records are going to happen, sooner than later. I can only assume no one really knows.

Saturday, November 15, 2008

What's new in November 2008

NOTHING.  

From what I can gather our government is still 'studying' the issue.  If you study something long enough, maybe it will just go away.  The present government has been studying the concept of open adoption records for 9 years, and nothing has happened.  How long does this subject have to be studied?  Many of the members of the present government were in opposition when the previous government studied the issue, and finally opened up adoption records, but only for future adoptions.  What has changed?  The results of the study done in 1997 is still applicable today.  What more do they have to study?  

If this issue can be delayed until the next election, then the present government may not have to deal with it.  Maybe I am cynical but after 15 years of lobbying, hearing the voices of the adoption community of Manitoba wanting open records, and nothing has yet happened, who would not be cynical.

We have been told that the question of open adoption records has to be 'studied' to make sure that it is appropriate for the citizens of Manitoba.  Why?  Are we so different from the citizens of Newfoundland/Labrador, British Columbia, Alberta and Ontario who have opened their records.  I was always led to believe that all citizens of Canada are equal.  What has happened?

I do not blame the Minister, who could exert his power if he truly understood the issue, but I do blame the unelected bureaucrats  who advise the Minister, and who are responsible to do the studies and to make recommendations to the Minister.  They are the ones who wield the power in the legislature and are the people who can influence the decisions of the Minister.  A Minister is only appointed to a department for a short time.  They are new to the job, have a lot to learn about the department, and rely heavily on the unelected staff to advise them.  Often the staff they rely on transmit their own biases.  If they are opposed to open adoption records then they will do everything in their power to derail any attempt to open them.  Hopefully a Minister can see through this veil of deceit and do what is right by the adoption community of Manitoba.

The legislature will sit later in November for approximately one month.  Maybe, just maybe, something will be forthcoming.

Roy Kading
LINKS

Wednesday, August 6, 2008

August 6, 2008 update

From what we have been told, the government is studying the open adoption laws of other jurisdictions to determine what would be the best for Manitoba. As far as we are concerned, just opening the adoption laws would be the best for Manitoba. So many other jurisdictions have done it and it is working well. What is different about the citizens of Manitoba?

I was given to understand that there would be some announcement very shortly about changes to the law, but have heard nothing yet. I appears that the government wants to go through a public information/discussion/opinion style of meeting again. The last one was done in 1997 and was shown to be in unanimous opinion that the adoption laws should be open. The government of the day must have recognized this because they passed the new law opening adoption records, but only for those people adopted after March 15, 1999. They will be able to get their identifying birth records, but the government did not see fit to make the law retroactive so there are thousands of adoptees being denied their birth information, and thousands of birthfamilies being denied information about the children given for adoption. The government can say that they have open adoption records. This is a fallacy because the open records only apply from March 1999 to the future and do not apply from approx. 1925 to 1999. Those adoptees and birthparents are still being treated as second class citizens, and are being denied information that all other citizens of Canada know by right of birth.

Please go to our website and send e-mails to all our MLA's, and the Minister of Family Services and Housing, voicing your opinion on this important subject. It is about time that all citizens of Manitoba and Canada are treated equally.

Roy Kading
LINKS

Sunday, April 29, 2007

further Post Adoption issues in Manitoba Canada

LINKS had a meeting in January 2007 with the Minister of Family Services and Housing, Gordon Mackintosh. He appeared to be very receptive to our concerns and we were very hopeful that changes may be made soon. However, there now has been an election call and everything will now be on hold. No doubt there will be a change of minister, even if the NDP is re-elected, and definitely if they are not. While other provinces in Canada are moving ahead with opening their adoption laws, Manitoba is still stuck in the 1900's with nothing happening. Hopefully we will finally get someone in government who will have the concerns of the adoption community on their agenda and enough foresight to address the issues and to finally accept the will of the majority. It is about time that the majority be listened to and not be continually subjected to the concerns of the minority.

Royden Kading
LINKS

Sunday, November 19, 2006

Post Adoption issues in Manitoba Canada

In 1997 public meetings were held across the province to get public opinion on what changes should be made to the Manitoba Adoption Act. Some good changes were made, but the main opinion to open adoption records was ignored. The changes went into effect on March 15, 1999. Shortly thereafter there was a provincial election and the government changed. Discussions were begun with the new Minister of Family Services, and since that time with 2 new Ministers. Now a 4th Minister has been appointed. Each time there is a new appointment, discussions start over again. Each of the first 3 Ministers have done nothing but stall on making any changes to the post-adoption portion of the Act. LINKS has yet to hear from the 4th Minister.

The usual spin is that they want to introduce major changes which will include a review of The Child and Family Services Authorities Act, The Child and Family Services Act and The Adoption Act, and address the issues in the Aboriginal Justice Inquiry. This review was supposed to have been completed in the fall of 2004, but due to it's complexity may not be completed until late 2006, or possibly later. From what we read in the newspapers about the scandalous performance of the Child and Family Services department in regards to the implementation of programs involved with this review, it may take years.

Now it is becoming very evident that a provincial election will be called in the spring of 2007. If such is the case, then it may be back to square one. Any changes in The Adoption Act will now be delayed as much as 3-4 years, if past experience with the government's lack of action is any indication.

What I find hard to understand is that other provinces in Canada are moving ahead with open adoption records and have their legislation either in effect i.e. British Columbia (1996), Alberta (2004), Newfoundland-Labrador (1999), or in the process of being implemented i.e. Ontario (2007). Alberta started the process of opening the adoption records and had a new law in effect within about 3 years, on November 1, 2004. Alberta and British Columbia law addresses all the main issues LINKS has with the existing Manitoba law.

The Minister responsible in 2003 advised that they were studying the new laws in other provinces "to determine whether they might be suitable to Manitoba". The Minister responsible in 2006 also advised they were examining other legislation "to determine whether they might be suitable to Manitoba". Sound familiar? If the changes are suitable to other provinces, what makes the government think that the citizens of Manitoba may want to be treated differently. The issues are the same. The Ministry goes to any lengths to delay making a decision.

It is about time that the Government of Manitoba addressed the issues of the thousands of adoptees and birthmothers, birthfathers, and siblings who are being discriminated against by their archaic post adoption policy. The present Manitoba Adoption Act is in direct violation of Section 15 of the Constitution Act, 1982, Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It is also in violation of the terms of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child which was ratified by Canada in December 1991 and agreed to by letter signed by the Premier of Manitoba. The Adoption Act is also exempt from the terms of the provincial Freedom of Information Act. The issue of closed adoption records was taken to the Manitoba Human Rights Commission but they have no power to enforce but can only make recommendations.

It is interesting to note that there is discrimination that the provincial government will not acknowledge. One Minister, No. 3, assured me that "our legislation ensures all adoptees are treated equally". While this is true, what is being ignored and treated as being irrelevant is that adoptees who also come under the provisions of Indian and Northern Affairs Canada can obtain identifying information about their birthfamily, information not obtainable by other adoptees. In my mind this is discrimination and the Minister of Family Services by refusing to recognize it, is condoning it.

Royden Kading
LINKS Post-Legal Adoption Support Group
http://members.shaw.ca/rkading